Brookfield Real Assets Income Fund Inc. (RA)
Score
2
- ClassSingle class
- Managed byBrookfield Public Securities Group LLC
- Release dateJanuary 20, 2024
- UpdatedNovember 11, 2025
Net Asset Value
$804MMax. Offering Size
Fixed (NYSE: RA)Investment Style
Diversified real assets: real estate, infrastructure, natural resources, credit & equityHQ Location
New York, NYAmount Raised
Not specifiedLegal Construction
Maryland corporationAsset Class
Real AssetsInception
December 2016Eligibility
Public (all investors via brokerage)Min. Investment
1 share (NYSE-traded)Annualized Distribution Rate
9.73%Net Total Return
5.24%, since inceptionDistributions
MonthlyIncentive Fee
NoneAnnual Management Fee
1.0% of daily NAV (+ expenses)Holding Period
Publicly traded; open-ended on exchangeAdvisor
Brookfield Public Securities Group LLCDealer Manager
Not applicable (NYSE traded)Auditor
Deloitte & Touche LLPCounsel
In-house (Scott Selig, VP Legal)The Bottom Line
Brookfield Real Assets Income Fund offers diversified exposure to real estate, infrastructure, and natural resources with monthly distributions of $0.118 per share. But the full picture tells a different story: you're paying 2.20% in annual expenses while the fund significantly underperformed the S&P 500 over eight years. The real assets approach sounds compelling until you realize the fund struggled during the recent rising rate environment that defined much of its history.
While Brookfield beat bonds and matched REITs, it massively underperformed stocks during one of the greatest bull markets in history. For younger investors building wealth, this represents a defensive allocation that provides steady income but comes at the cost of missing substantial growth during your prime earning years when compound returns matter most. The closed-end structure adds another layer of complexity—you can't simply redeem shares at their underlying value like a mutual fund. Instead, you're at the mercy of market pricing, which has consistently valued this fund below what its holdings are actually worth.
Your Money vs. Reality
Investment Amount: $10,000
Notes on Period: Analysis covers 8.75-year period from fund inception (December 5, 2016) through September 2025. Performance reflects the fund’s market price returns including dividends, showing strong outperformance versus fixed income but substantial lag versus equities.
Index Sources: For iShares Select US REIT ETF, iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation, SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust, SPDR Gold Trust, iShares 0-5 Year TIPS Bond ETF and iShares 7-10 Year Treasury Bond ETF has been considered.
Key Takeaways: The comparison to the S&P 500 shows the true cost of this defensive strategy. An investor who chose Brookfield over basic stock market exposure gave up $14,624 in potential gains—nearly doubling the opportunity cost. Even a simple 60/40 balanced portfolio slightly outperformed with less complexity.
This massive opportunity cost highlights the challenge of defensive real asset strategies during periods when growth assets dominate. The fund did provide superior returns to bonds but failed to justify its complexity and higher fees versus simpler alternatives.
Fund Strategy
Brookfield Real Assets Income Fund provides diversified exposure to real assets including real estate, infrastructure, natural resources, credit, and equities. Structured as a publicly traded closed-end fund (NYSE: RA), it prioritizes monthly income distributions with potential inflation protection, making it a defensive allocation tool.
Fit Check
Available to:
All public investors via brokerage (NYSE-traded, no minimum beyond 1 share)
Ideal For:
- Income-focused investors seeking high monthly distributions (9.7% yield)
- Those wanting diversified real asset exposure as a defensive or bond-alternative allocation
- Investors comfortable with closed-end fund structures and discount volatility
Less Ideal For:
- Investors prioritizing capital growth over income
- Fee-sensitive investors or those preferring simple exposure via low-cost REIT or real asset ETFs
- Those who need guaranteed redemption at net asset value
Fast Facts
Key Concern
Reality Check
Underperformance vs. Stocks
Missed $14,624 in S&P 500 gains during prime bull market.
High Expense Ratio
2.19% total expenses significantly reduce net returns over time.
Persistent Discount to NAV
Currently at 8.21% discount could widen during market stress.
Closed-End Structure Risks
Cannot redeem at NAV; subject to market pricing and liquidity constraints.
Complex Multi-Asset Strategy
Difficult to understand holdings and performance attribution across sectors.
Pros/Bulls Say
- Diversified real asset income under Brookfield expertise: Access to a $1T+ AUM platform spanning real estate, infrastructure, and natural resources through one professionally managed, monthly-paying closed-end fund.
- Inflation hedge potential: Real assets have historically protected better than bonds during inflationary periods, while income-producing assets help guard against rising costs.
- Attractive monthly distributions: Current payout of $0.118 per share (9.73% yield on NAV) provides steady income, useful for reinvestment or meeting living expenses.
Cons/Bears Say
- Severe underperformance versus equities: Investors missed approximately $14,600 in S&P 500 gains over eight years while paying over 2% annually in fees. The closed-end structure magnified opportunity cost during one of history's strongest equity markets.
- High fee drag: Total expenses of 2.19% require significant outperformance just to match low-cost REIT or infrastructure ETFs charging under 0.50%. Fees are calculated on leveraged assets, making the true cost on your equity higher than the stated 1.0%.
- Structural discount risk: Shares consistently trade below net asset value, currently at an 8.21% discount, meaning you could sell $100 worth of holdings for only $92 in the market.
Verdict
2/5 — Brookfield Real Assets Income Fund offers steady monthly dividends and diversified exposure to inflation-sensitive assets, but high fees, persistent discount to NAV, and long-term equity underperformance make it more of an income play than a wealth-building allocation. The closed-end structure adds complexity that may not benefit most investors.
Fees & Expenses
Fee Type
Why It Matters
How Calculated
Typical Amount
Fee Impact Example:
$10,000 invested in RA over 10 years could lose $2,190+ to fees alone at current expense levels (2.19% annually), not including the impact of trading at a discount to NAV.
- After expenses, total returns lag cheaper index funds significantly.
- Low-cost REIT or S&P 500 ETFs charge 0.03–0.50%, versus 2.19% here.
- Fee drag could cut lifetime wealth creation significantly compared to passive alternatives.
Portfolio Snapshot
Asset Type
By Sector
Credit Quality
Geography
Overview
ALIGNMENT: Below Average
- The portfolio managers reported no ownership of the fund’s shares (“$0–$10,000” for each manager), and all fund officers and directors together owned less than 1% of the outstanding shares. This means the team running the fund has limited personal ‘skin in the game’.
- The 2.19% total expense ratio creates substantial fee drag, but the structure does align incentives somewhat when assets grow, as management fees increase proportionally. However, the fact that management fees are calculated on leveraged assets (Managed Assets rather than Net Assets) means Brookfield benefits more from using leverage than a typical fee structure would suggest.
Performance: Average
- Annualized returns of 5.24% significantly lagged broader markets and even simple balanced portfolios, with performance struggling particularly during growth-led environments and rising interest rates that dominated much of the fund’s history.
- Multi-sector allocations mean returns may be diluted when only some strategies outperform, and income sustainability depends on real asset sectors facing secular challenges. The persistent discount to NAV (-8.21% currently) suggests the market questions the fund’s value proposition.
Market Risk: Above Average
- Holdings are very sensitive to rising interest rates, which depress valuations and increase funding costs for leveraged positions. Downturns reduce demand and occupancy in infrastructure, real estate, and resources investments.
- Environmental, regulatory, and technological disruptions threaten traditional asset business models, and international exposures (30-40% of portfolio) add currency, trade, and geopolitical risks. The 2022-2023 rate hiking cycle demonstrated this vulnerability clearly.
Business Risk: Average
- Brookfield’s institutional support is strong, but managing a complex strategy across real estate, infrastructure, and natural resources creates execution and focus risks, especially with recent changes among key portfolio managers.
- The closed-end structure reduces redemption pressure, supporting long-term decisions, but limits flexibility if investor confidence wavers or regulatory changes hit multiple portfolio sectors.
Debt Risk: Average
- The fund employs 24.6% leverage, amplifying both returns and losses and increasing risks tied to margin calls and rising interest expenses in tougher credit markets.
- Many underlying holdings use additional leverage at the asset level, compounding risk if credit dries up or asset values fall. Currency fluctuations and compliance challenges could require additional capital, especially in infrastructure and resources sectors.
Liquidity Risk: Below Average
- Daily liquidity is available via NYSE trading, but market prices can diverge sharply from NAV during stress periods, currently reflected in wide discounts to intrinsic value.
- Fund shares are tradeable but subject to overall market sentiment, unlike open-end funds that guarantee redemptions at NAV; bid-ask spreads and forced selling can hurt investors in volatile conditions.
Transparency: Above Average
- Monthly NAV updates and quarterly portfolio breakdowns provide more detail than private funds, though less than traditional equity funds. Public holdings get market pricing, but attribution across three sectors and multiple geographies makes it difficult for investors to assess true drivers of performance or identify underperformers.
- Disclosures about risk management, leverage details, and decision-making processes are adequately provided.
Manager Insights

Christopher Janus
Co-Portfolio ManagerExperience & Highlights: 16+ years Brookfield; Director at Brookfield Asset Management; Asset allocation portfolio manager across real asset sectors; Credit analyst covering real estate across HY, IG, Bank Loans and CMBS.
Education: B.S., Mechanical Engineering, Miami University.

Paula Horn
Co-Portfolio Manager & CIOExperience & Highlights: 31+ years investment experience; President and Chief Investment Officer, Brookfield Public Securities Group; Credit knowledge and macro insights across Brookfield platform.
Education: MBA from Northwestern University and a BA from Tufts University.

Riley O'Neal
Co-Portfolio ManagerExperience & Highlights: Director of Risk Management; Member of PSG’s risk management team since 2016; Quantitative analysis expertise for multi-asset allocation decisions.
Education: Bachelor of Science in Finance and Accounting from Indiana University; CFA charterholder.
Peer Comparison
Disclaimer
All Rights Reserved. The data and analyses contained herein are the property of Noyack and are protected by copyright and other intellectual property laws. The information provided is intended solely for informational purposes and should not be construed as investment advice. It is not an offer to buy or sell a security, and it is not intended to be used as the sole basis for any investment decision. The information contained in this document is believed to be accurate and reliable based on sources believed to be reliable, but Noyack makes no representation or warranty, express or implied, as to its completeness, accuracy, or timeliness. The data and analyses are subject to change without notice and Noyack is not obligated to update this information. The use of the information contained in this document is at the sole risk of the reader, and Noyack shall not be responsible for any losses, damages, or expenses incurred by any person as a result of reliance on the information contained herein. Noyack does not endorse or approve any investment or trading strategy and does not guarantee any specific outcome or profit. The reader should always conduct their own independent analysis and consult with a qualified financial advisor before making any investment decisions. This document may contain forward-looking statements and projections which are subject to risks and uncertainties, and actual results may differ materially. Past performance is not indicative of future results. This document is not intended for distribution to, or use by, any person or entity in any jurisdiction or country where such distribution or use would be contrary to local law or regulation. Noyack reserves the right to modify or discontinue the provision of the information contained in this document, in whole or in part, at any time and without notice. The information contained in this document is provided “as is” and Noyack makes no representation or warranty of any kind, express or implied, as to the accuracy, timeliness, completeness, merchantability or fitness for any particular purpose of the information contained in this document. Noyack shall not be liable for any errors or omissions contained in this document or for any damages whatsoever arising out of or in connection with the use of this document.



