Alternative Credit Income Fund (RCIAX)
Score
1
- ClassA
- Managed byBC Partners
- Release dateApril 24, 2024
- UpdatedSeptember 28, 2025
Net Asset Value
$227M(as of 9/30/2024)
Max. Offering Size
UnlimitedInvestment Style
CoreHQ Location
London, UK (Registered under BC Partners); U.S. Fund OperationsAmount Raised
$268.47 million (as of annual report)Legal Construction
Delaware Statutory TrustAsset Class
Private CreditInception
April 2015Eligibility
Non-Accredited InvestorsMin. Investment
$2,500 (non-qualified); $1,000 (qualified accounts)Annualized Distribution Rate
7.65% (as of 3/31/2025)Net Total Return
5.65% annualized since inception(as of 3/31/2025; net of all fees and inclusive of distributions)
Distributions
QuarterlyIncentive Fee
9.0% annual hurdle rate, subject to 100% catch-up featureAnnual Management Fee
1.85%Holding Period
Permanent CapitalAdvisor
Sierra Crest Investment Management LLCDistributor
ALPS Distributors, Inc.Auditor
BBD, LLPCounsel
Thompson Hine LLPThe Bottom Line
Alternative Credit Income Fund spreads your dollars across public high-yield bonds, middle-market loans and slices of private-credit funds. Management can dial exposure up or down, chasing the best-paying pockets of credit at any moment. That flexibility is the hook.
What most investors miss: the fund’s front-end sales charge and steep 4.75% expense ratio carve a big hole in every quarterly payout. You also have to wait for the fund’s once-a-quarter redemption window (maximum 5% of shares) if you ever need your cash back.
Your Money vs. Reality
A look at what actually happened to $10,000 invested at the fund’s launch versus the major yardsticks over the same stretch. $10,000 Over 10.2 Years (17 Apr 2015 – 18 Jul 2025)
Note: Class A returns include the full 5.75% front-end load and all ongoing expenses.
Index proxies: For iShares Select US REIT ETF, iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation, SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust, SPDR Gold Trust, iShares 0-5 Year TIPS Bond ETF and iShares 7-10 Year Treasury Bond ETF have been considered.
Key take-aways
- The Alternative Credit Income Fund (ACIF) delivered a 5.7% annualized return, outperforming both U.S. Treasuries and TIPS, which returned -1.3% and 0.4%, respectively.
- ACIF also outpaced income-oriented allocations like U.S. REITs (2.0%) and the traditional 60/40 portfolio (3.5%), showing resilience in yield-seeking environments.
- However, its returns lagged far behind broad equities and real assets—the S&P 500 grew 10.5% annually, and gold returned 9.7% over the same period.
- High fees and front-end loads materially reduced compounding benefits, limiting ACIF’s competitiveness as a core growth vehicle.
- The fund’s performance profile may still appeal to income-focused investors seeking lower volatility than equities, but not to those prioritizing long-term capital growth.
Fund Strategy
A “go-anywhere” credit strategy:
Roughly 45% direct private loans, 30% public credit funds/BDC shares, 25% structured credit & preferreds.
93% floating-rate, 78% senior-secured assets (12/31/24).
Quarterly repurchase offers (≥ 5% of shares) — no daily liquidity.
Fit Check
Ideal For:
- Income-hunters who value diversification beyond plain-vanilla bonds.
- Investors comfortable leaving money parked for years with limited exit windows.
Less Ideal For:
- HENRYs chasing fast-compounding growth.
- Anyone who may need to tap principal quickly or dislikes multilayer fees.
Fast Facts
Key Concern
What It Means for You
4.75% Expense Ratio
Nearly five cents of every dollar disappear to fees each year.
5.75% Front Load
$10,000 becomes $9,425 on day one — a big head-start handicap.
Quarterly Liquidity Cap
Only 5% of shares can be cashed out each quarter; exits may be prorated.
Mixed Quality Credit
Heavy below-investment-grade exposure could stumble in a recession.
Pros/Bulls Say
- Quarterly dividend north of 9% keeps cash flow coming in.
- Flexible mandate lets managers hunt yield in both public and private credit niches.
- Seven-plus-year record of positive total returns through different rate regimes.
Cons/Bears Say
- Fee stack (load + 4.75% ER) erodes long-term compounding.
- Returns lag simple, lower-cost high-yield ETFs after all costs.
- Quarterly redemption gate limits access during market stress.
Verdict
1 / 5 — A high-yielding income sleeve, but the steep fee drag and limited liquidity make it a poor core holding for most Millennial HENRYs building wealth.
Fees & Expenses
Fee Type
Why It Matters
How Calculated
Typical Amount
Fee Impact Example:
$10,000 for 10 years at a 6% gross return:
- About $575 upfront + $475/yr ongoing.
- Roughly $5,325 lost to fees, cutting gains nearly in half.
Portfolio Snapshot
Asset Type
Geography
Tenant Industry
Overview
ALIGNMENT: Below Average
- The fund structure prioritizes management remuneration with up-front loads and high fixed fees, meaning managers are compensated regardless of long-term fund success. There is no clear disclosure of personal manager co-investment, making it hard for investors to judge if leadership is genuinely aligned with their interests.
- Since incentive fees are minimal and details on team investment are vague, investors face a risk that managers have little financial stake in outcomes. HENRY investors should be particularly cautious of these structural alignment weaknesses when comparing options.
Performance: Below Average
- Since 2015, the fund’s 5.5% annualized return matches broader high-yield benchmarks, but falls short of equities and trails rival credit interval funds. Calamos and PIMCO peers, for instance, have consistently yielded stronger performance over the same period.
- Monthly dividends offer income stability, but limited capital growth means the fund is less compelling for those seeking to build significant wealth. The track record underscores the need to balance current yield with growth potential in a personal portfolio.
Market Risk: Average
- The fund’s portfolio of floating-rate loans helps blunt the effects of rising interest rates, cushioning some volatility in income and valuation. This feature provides some resilience versus traditional fixed-rate strategies in a fluctuating rate environment.
- However, heavy exposure to sub-investment-grade credit means that defaults could spike if economic conditions worsen. A downturn could lead to notable net asset value (NAV) declines and disrupt even steady income flows.
Business Risk: Average
- The interval fund structure provides some operational advantage by smoothing out cash movement and reducing the likelihood of a liquidity crisis triggered by a run on the fund. Absence of fund-level leverage also greatly reduces the risk of catastrophic losses due to forced selling.
- Despite these features, the fund’s reliance on a core management group increases key-person risk. Should one or two crucial managers depart or underperform, strategic consistency and execution may suffer more than at larger, team-based funds.
Debt Risk: Average
- The fund maintains minimal leverage at its own level, which helps insulate investors from risks associated with rising interest rates or forced refinancing, allowing the fund to weather shifting market dynamics more safely.
- Nonetheless, underlying portfolio companies often operate with sizable debt. If default rates climb or credit markets tighten, these high-debt borrowers could create knock-on effects, impacting NAV stability and the sustainability of distributions.
Liquidity Risk: Above Average
- Investors are offered liquidity through quarterly repurchase windows covering up to 5% of the fund’s NAV. While more flexible than fully illiquid structures, this system can quickly become overburdened during times of market turmoil or widespread redemption requests.
- When many investors look to exit at once, withdrawals may be delayed or proportionally reduced. HENRY investors considering this vehicle should plan ahead, as access to cash is not guaranteed in emergencies.
Transparency: Above Average
- The fund stands out for its detailed daily NAV reporting, quarterly holdings documentation, and comprehensive SEC filings, providing clear visibility into its operations and portfolio composition.
- Regularly published fund details and frequent updates surpass industry norms for private credit investments. This increased transparency benefits investors who value frequent, plain-language reporting and want to monitor their investments without specialized financial tools.
Manager Insights

Ted Goldthorpe
Partner, Head of BC Partners CreditExperience & Highlights: Joined BCP in 2017; former President & CIO at Apollo Investment; 13 years at Goldman Sachs in special situations.
Education: B.Comm, Queen’s University.

Michael Terwilliger
Portfolio ManagerExperience & Highlights: Nearly 20 years; manages Alternative Credit Income Fund; ex-MD at Resource Alternative Advisor; credit analyst at Shenkman and BofA Merrill Lynch.
Education: B.A., Northwestern University; MBA, UVA Darden School; CFA charterholder.
Peer Comparison
Disclaimer
All Rights Reserved. The data and analyses contained herein are the property of Noyack and are protected by copyright and other intellectual property laws. The information provided is intended solely for informational purposes and should not be construed as investment advice. It is not an offer to buy or sell a security, and it is not intended to be used as the sole basis for any investment decision. The information contained in this document is believed to be accurate and reliable based on sources believed to be reliable, but Noyack makes no representation or warranty, express or implied, as to its completeness, accuracy, or timeliness. The data and analyses are subject to change without notice and Noyack is not obligated to update this information. The use of the information contained in this document is at the sole risk of the reader, and Noyack shall not be responsible for any losses, damages, or expenses incurred by any person as a result of reliance on the information contained herein. Noyack does not endorse or approve any investment or trading strategy and does not guarantee any specific outcome or profit. The reader should always conduct their own independent analysis and consult with a qualified financial advisor before making any investment decisions. This document may contain forward-looking statements and projections which are subject to risks and uncertainties, and actual results may differ materially. Past performance is not indicative of future results. This document is not intended for distribution to, or use by, any person or entity in any jurisdiction or country where such distribution or use would be contrary to local law or regulation. Noyack reserves the right to modify or discontinue the provision of the information contained in this document, in whole or in part, at any time and without notice. The information contained in this document is provided “as is” and Noyack makes no representation or warranty of any kind, express or implied, as to the accuracy, timeliness, completeness, merchantability or fitness for any particular purpose of the information contained in this document. Noyack shall not be liable for any errors or omissions contained in this document or for any damages whatsoever arising out of or in connection with the use of this document.



